Timeline for Complex review how much context?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11 at 7:42 | comment | added | Toby Speight | Sounds like a good outline to me. I'm not sure what you mean by "simulating the environment", but if it's anything like a programming-challenge or interview-question, then it sounds like the kind of context that's well-received here. Certainly, an explanation of the operation of your code is very useful, as it can help reviewers identify any discrepancies compared to the actual behaviour. | |
| Oct 7 at 21:41 | comment | added | Peilonrayz Mod | Personally I wouldn't assume the #4 user on our site is abusing the site. I'm not really sure what you'd like us to answer with. I feel you already know about zombie ratings, and the answer I'd post is duplicate to your last question. | |
| Oct 7 at 19:33 | comment | added | Mast Mod | How people are going to feel in general, is very hard to gauge. | |
| Oct 7 at 19:25 | comment | added | Mast Mod | Licensing wise you should be fine as long as you comply with the CC BY-SA the content is provided under. Based on what you shared here, I don't see any problems on the horizon. | |
| Oct 7 at 18:45 | comment | added | Loki Astari | @Mast: Eventually I want to turn what I have learned into a Blog. Getting the code reviewed / fixed / spruced up, is part of that processes. I don't want others to feel like I am abusing the site by doing this. | |
| Oct 7 at 16:43 | comment | added | Mast Mod | More context is usually better. Not everyone will read a wall of text, but with the kind of questions you pose you'll prefer reviewers who don't shy away from that anyway. What are you concerned about? | |
| Oct 7 at 13:32 | history | asked | Loki Astari | CC BY-SA 4.0 |