Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 19, 2014 at 17:28 comment added rolfl @ChrisW That may be true... that *NIXy argument is weak.... ;-) The point is that IPC and chid-processes are orthoganal.
Feb 19, 2014 at 17:26 comment added ChrisW @rolfl "IPC" is also used in Windows/MSDN documentation, e.g. here.
Feb 18, 2014 at 21:27 history edited 200_success CC BY-SA 3.0
Marked as completed
Feb 18, 2014 at 21:20 comment added rolfl Second comment... IPC is also very *NIXy ... whereas child processes is common on all platforms....
Feb 18, 2014 at 21:18 comment added rolfl I think IPC is both too broad, and perhaps too narrow. IPC is a lot more than running a child process. It is signals, shared memory segments, pipes, buffers, fifos, sockets, etc. IPC happens between processes, whether those processes are child processes, or completely unrelated. It is an orthogonal concept
Feb 18, 2014 at 19:15 comment added ChrisW @SimonAndréForsberg IPC isn't only used for coordinating child processes; more generally it includes memory-mapped files, sockets, named mutexes, etc.
Feb 18, 2014 at 19:04 comment added Simon Forsberg Very well then, perhaps it's just me that haven't heard about it before :)
Feb 18, 2014 at 19:02 comment added jliv902 I think IPC is a good tag. @SimonAndréForsberg: I just did a google search. It was the third result, so I think it would be easy for people to find.
Feb 18, 2014 at 9:06 comment added Simon Forsberg IPC is probably an abbreviation which not many people are used to. Therefore, I don't think it would be a good tag. Perhaps it can be labeled something else?
S Feb 18, 2014 at 6:46 history answered 200_success CC BY-SA 3.0
S Feb 18, 2014 at 6:46 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by 200_success