Timeline for Is it bad to reference the best titles?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 10, 2015 at 9:19 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeReview/status/630669795420205056 | ||
Jul 21, 2015 at 14:04 | vote | accept | SirPython | ||
Jul 20, 2015 at 16:04 | answer | added | Simon ForsbergMod | timeline score: 9 | |
Jul 20, 2015 at 15:45 | comment | added | SirPython | @SimonAndréForsberg Thanks for tip. I posted my concerns here because I had seen it posted by a multitude of users already, and I figured it was time for a meta. From now on, I will just tell the user my concern when I see that comment. | |
Jul 20, 2015 at 15:43 | comment | added | Simon Forsberg Mod | My personal opinion is that comments about comments should be given to the people who posts the comments, I have a feeling that at least 75% of the people who will see this meta question aren't really affected by it. As long as there's not a meta question posted for each and every time there's a suggestion for a frequently posted comment, I guess this one is OK. But consider talking to the user(s) who post the comment first before taking it to meta. (Although I might not be the best person to ask about this as I myself use that comment fairly often). | |
Jul 20, 2015 at 15:26 | comment | added | SirPython | @SimonAndréForsberg Should I delete this meta and post my concern over there, or should I leave a link on that meta to this meta (which has my concern). | |
Jul 20, 2015 at 15:25 | comment | added | Simon Forsberg Mod | The frequent comment comes from here: meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/a/4957/31562 . Feel free to comment on any frequent comments that you feel can be improved. | |
Jul 20, 2015 at 15:24 | history | edited | JamalMod |
edited tags
|
|
Jul 20, 2015 at 15:16 | history | asked | SirPython | CC BY-SA 3.0 |