Timeline for If SO had a standard off-topic reason for code review requests, how should it be worded?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 1, 2015 at 4:45 | comment | added | 200_success Mod | I like that this better distinguishes between what make the question off-topic for Stack Overflow and what makes a question on-topic on Code Review. | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 21:12 | history | edited | holroy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed examining to evaluation
|
| Nov 30, 2015 at 20:53 | history | edited | holroy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated link similar to that of EBrown
|
| Nov 30, 2015 at 20:51 | comment | added | holroy | @Jamal, this applies to both answers, and should possibly be added on question? | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 20:51 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon Mod | @Jamal but, the standard close reason for SU does mention SU... | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 20:49 | comment | added | Jamal Mod | For the same reason why we removed site names from our close reasons, it may be best not to include our site on there. Otherwise, it may just cause someone to post their low quality question here anyway. | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 20:48 | history | answered | holroy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |