Timeline for RoboSanta the pimp
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 27, 2015 at 22:58 | comment | added | 200_success Mod | @holroy Yes, that could do the job. Flagging as Not an Answer also works. | |
| Dec 27, 2015 at 22:56 | comment | added | holroy | @200_success. How? Flagging as in need of moderator invention? | |
| Dec 27, 2015 at 22:54 | comment | added | 200_success Mod | @holroy Yes, a post can be converted to Community Wiki after posting, and I did that to Edward's answer. | |
| Dec 27, 2015 at 22:53 | comment | added | holroy | @200_success, can you then flag such an answer to be converted to a Community Wiki? Can it be changed into a Community Wiki after posting? | |
| Dec 26, 2015 at 18:27 | comment | added | Edward | Ah, I didn't know that one. Thanks @200_success. | |
| Dec 26, 2015 at 18:23 | comment | added | 200_success Mod | The etiquette for selfie answers that don't add insight is to mark it as Community Wiki to make it rep-neutral. Strictly speaking, it's Not an Answer because it's not a code review. | |
| Dec 26, 2015 at 18:23 | comment | added | Edward | @janos: No worries. I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something important. | |
| Dec 26, 2015 at 17:39 | comment | added | janos Mod | My apologies. Nothing wrong with selfie answers, in general, at all. In fact it's encouraged SE-wide. I didn't explain well (fixed now) what I really meant: selfie accepted answers with zero or negative score, when there are other answers with positive score. So I meant not just any selfie selfie answer, but a much more specific kind, a small subset. Really sorry about this. | |
| Dec 26, 2015 at 17:12 | history | answered | Edward | CC BY-SA 3.0 |