This seven year old question was recently edited to update some of the links in it.
However, this question would nowadays be rejected as not-reviewable code. Should such old questions be nominated for closing if we encounter them?
On other SEs such questions are sometimes locked with the notification that they're technically off-topic, but are preserved for history's sake (or something along those lines).
I don't see a compelling historical value to this question.
So no need to lock and keep; just treat it the same as any newer question.
There is something to be said about handling questions that get resurfaced "organically" vs. actively seeking out older questions and flagging / closing them. Since this question was surfaced by an edit (albeit one that was triggered through some tool assistance), I would want to evaluate the question according to the current standards.
It's not productive to sift through all the "old" questions on site to check whether they are still on-topic. It's also not really productive to ignore old and off-topic questions that became active recently, just because they are old.
In summary I'd say: Vote to close if you happen across a question like that, but don't actively look for such questions.
