14
\$\begingroup\$

Our new asker's modal has the three bullets:

  1. Summarize the problem
  2. Provide details and any research
  3. When appropriate, describe what you've tried

We are able to remove the third bullet point (see "Short version …" section at the end of that answer). I'd like to propose that we do that.

There are arguments for and against, so it's important that we have a frank discussion to reach consensus on whether that's what we want as a community.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ That list is perfect for SO, really doesn't work for CR. There should be no problem in the code on CR. \$\endgroup\$
    – pacmaninbw
    Mar 12 at 13:21

4 Answers 4

22
\$\begingroup\$

Yes.

This statement implies that if you've tried and failed, then you can post your non-working attempt on CR.

We should remove that instruction.

\$\endgroup\$
5
\$\begingroup\$

Yes - and also.

Remove the third bullet, and add a sentence elsewhere in the modal encouraging askers to summarise the "paths not taken".

\$\endgroup\$
5
\$\begingroup\$

Rather than just "Summarize the problem", how about "Summarize the problem the code solves"?

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ That would be nice, but it's not listed as one of the site-specific changes that are provided (see the linked Meta.SE question). \$\endgroup\$ Mar 12 at 13:33
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ It might be worth proposing this anyway. Even if it can't currently be done, perhaps this will encourage them to make it possible. \$\endgroup\$
    – mdfst13
    Mar 13 at 22:19
-7
\$\begingroup\$

No.

Describing the approaches not used can be useful, particularly in performance questions.

We should keep asking posters to describe what else they have tried.

\$\endgroup\$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .