I'm looking for some people/community who are doing each others' software reviews, but not only code. Actually code is the least important. I would like somebody look at my software as a whole and tell me his opinion about future development. Somebody who can look at my website (which shows my software) and tell me what he doesn't like.
Of course I can do the same for others. Actually, such online community works for writers...
I understand your concern, but Code Review is unfortunately not the place that you are looking for.
I would recommend asking among your friends, on Twitter/Facebook, or on Reddit.
Or you could propose a new Stack Exchange site for "Software Reviews". Or take a look at the existing related proposals:
Out of these, Website Review sounds like what you are primarily looking for. So go ahead and contribute to the proposal. Follow the proposal and ask example questions, and recruit additional followers, to help it reach the next phase!
Although be aware that as it currently seems, it is unlikely that there will be such a Stack Exchange site. This is because Stack Exchange sites does not like to be dependent on third party links, something which seems unavoidable for this kind of site. On Code Review we work around this problem by forcing the code to be reviewed to be inside the question.
On Code Review, it's the code that is in focus. A feature-request can sometimes be a part of a review, or added as a comment (but are not the primary focus). But to get such reviews/comments here, you need to post an on-topic question, which needs to include code.
Reviewing software as a whole is probably something you'd want done professionally, by people you're paying to dig into your code and issue recommendations. Reviewing a whole project is tedious, it takes a lot of time and effort.
On Code Review we review code, but our definition of code sure includes scripts (javascript, php), but html and css are certainly reviewable, too (hence, we have tags for them!).
You have found what I firmly believe is the best place on the Internet to get your project reviewed, to get a number of eyes and new perspectives on what you've written.
However people on Code Review are volunteers, people that enjoy reviewing other people's code - reviewers do this for free the imaginary Internet points, and asking them to spend a day or two on your code to produce a thorough review, is a bit of a stretch. Not to mention the 30K character limit [thankfully] imposed by the StackExchange software.
The solution is to break your project down into parts, or themes, that suit a particular specific tag or group of tags (see our tags), and to ask reviewers to review what you're posting (make sure you embed the relevant code/script/markup in the question).
For example, your web application might be following a MVC architecture - you could post a model, a view and a controller together in one post and ask for that to be reviewed.
The controller might have a dependency on a service that performs CRUD operations - that service could be the subject of another post.
The view might have a dependency on a CSS style sheet - you could post the markup and the CSS and ask for that to be peer reviewed.
The idea is to keep your posts digestible, so that when the volunteers scanning the site for zombies (unanswered questions) stumble upon your post, they want to take the time to write down their thoughts in an answer.
I don't agree with @Simon's idea (yes, that's my downvote!) to use another site for this. CR is proven, it's been around - and yet it's still in beta. Diluting the idea of a peer review into multiple sites isn't going to help anything. I wouldn't want to review a whole entire code base at once, not for free.
