9
\$\begingroup\$

As part of our mass meta-tag burnination, we're also considering . It also seems closely related to , which has been burninated and blacklisted just recently. We already have a tag, which is not up for burnination. I don't think we need very many database-related tags since we already have a site dedicated to this: Database Administrators. I'm also thinking that it may slightly reduce the chances of receiving questions solely about databases (no code), which will get migrated to Database Administrators anyway.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ NOTE: The action taken was synonymization, not merging. I've accepted that answer anyway since I followed a similar course of action. \$\endgroup\$ – Jamal Jul 26 '14 at 14:49
7
\$\begingroup\$

No, we don't. Merge them into I say.

I just don't really see a need. There is a whole SE site dedicated to DB Administration, and schema-design/database-design is more looking at charts and concepts than code generally.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Could you please explain your reasoning? Burnination and merging are both irreversible, so I don't want to get this wrong. \$\endgroup\$ – Jamal Jul 25 '14 at 16:59
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ I just don't really see a need, as you said, there is a whole SE site dedicated to DB stuff, and schema-design/database-design is more looking at charts and concepts than code generally. \$\endgroup\$ – Phrancis Jul 25 '14 at 17:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .