Currently, there's 17 tagged questions for this tag, either being superfluous (use every tag I can) kinda questions, or very complex ternaries replaced a potentially large if-else statement, like Forming a dictionary where all values are only conditionally set

Should be burninated or as @Jamal pointed out in the comments, or synonymise with ?

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Noooooo (yes) \$\endgroup\$ – Ethan Bierlein Jul 3 '15 at 0:16
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ What about synonymization with conditions? \$\endgroup\$ – Jamal Jul 3 '15 at 0:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ This title should be [ternary-operator].bad_tag(), not ==. == makes no sense here. \$\endgroup\$ – Fund Monica's Lawsuit Jul 19 '16 at 21:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ @QPaysTaxes bad_tag is a constant, whereas [ternary-operator] doesn't have a bad tag method \$\endgroup\$ – Quill Jul 19 '16 at 21:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yeah, but == suggests that there's only one tag that's bad_tag. Maybe bad_tags.include([ternary-operator])? \$\endgroup\$ – Fund Monica's Lawsuit Jul 19 '16 at 21:43
  • \$\begingroup\$ @QPaysTaxes, not necessarily. bad_tag as a constant can be compared to any other tag \$\endgroup\$ – Quill Jul 19 '16 at 21:45

I think this should be synonymized with instead of burninating it altogether. This does still involve conditionals, the difference being is that this is about the operator. A few questions are also already tagged with .

I've suggested the synonymization here.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .