I came across "Testing current, new or friends firms as max output and least effort" the other day, and have been thinking it's off-topic. There is too little information to do more than a 'lint review'.
The core class(es) aren't there and so forces us to stick with code that just seems wrong. This is as most lines are calling undefined functions, where we don't know how they are implemented, which is as helpful as hypothetical code.
We don't allow stub code, hypothetical code or pseudocode on Code Review. I find the stub code explanation best to explain why this too should be closed:
If your question contains stub code, then there are significant pieces of the core functionality missing, and we need you to fill in the details. Excerpts of large projects are fine, but if you have omitted too much, then reviewers are left imagining how your program works.
Should we close this question?