I was reading a question tagged with both emacs and elisp, and noticed the guidance for both was the same. It seems to me that emacs could be useful for non-Lisp code (e.g. c language extensions, or python or bash code to interoperate with an Emacs mode), so I edited it.
But unbeknownst to me (and unnoticed by me) that meant I was actually editing elisp (wrongly). Can someone please reject that edit (and if possible, unmerge the two tags)? Thanks.