Allow me to expand: in these answers I went through the code almost line by line, and noted everything that jumped at me; by the time I was done, I already had a quite lengthy answer and decided to stop there.
In both cases, re-reading myself I find my answers look like code bashing sessions, shredding the OP's code to pieces. That's certainly symptomatic of my "read-the-code-and-note-everything-I-don't-like" approach, and could make me sound like a harsh dude that comes along and bitches about everything I see in someone else's code.
In this case, I hinted between the lines that a more OOP approach would be much better, and ended up intentionally leaving out an actual alternative approach, 1 because my answer was getting way too long, and 2 because I figured I'd leave room for other answers. I was thanked, upvoted and my answer was even accepted, and when I told the OP that the acceptance might be premature my answer kept its green tick.
Then another [excellent if not epic] answer came, which basically picked up where I left off and, without the slightest hint at the OP's code, gave the alternative approach I had in mind.
I don't mind that my answer was un-accepted and that the other one got the green tick - it's the OP's call and it's all fair game, and that other answer is really absolutely great.
I made the effort of downloading the OP's code, building it, running it, reviewing it, writing a code review to the best of my abilities, ...and yet the OP deems the other answer as most useful, the one that I could have written by merely reading the OP's post - again, not to take anything away from that great answer (which even quotes mine).
So the question is, exactly what is expected from the "best answer" on this site? An actual code review? Or an alternative approach? The best of both worlds, even if it means an answer so long that only the OP will read entirely (if we're lucky)?