3
Thank you for calling us out on this.
From my perspective
One would think that after 3352 CV reviews a user in the review queues should know what he or she is doing. I admit that I was the fifth reviewer and I came into it, seeing that it had:
1 CV for missing context
2 votes for migration
I.I.R.C. 1 vote for needs more detail.
Regretfully I didn't fully ...
2
There is something to be said about handling questions that get resurfaced "organically" vs. actively seeking out older questions and flagging / closing them. Since this question was surfaced by an edit (albeit one that was triggered through some tool assistance), I would want to evaluate the question according to the current standards.
It's not ...
2
Just vote to close
I don't see a compelling historical value to this question.
So no need to lock and keep; just treat it the same as any newer question.
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
