Timeline for Should we have a [reactive-programming] tag?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2015 at 11:45 | comment | added | RubberDuck | I started a new meta about socket.io here @jacwah meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/5834/… | |
| Jul 31, 2015 at 9:10 | comment | added | jacwah | @mjolka That's probably true too. I think I shouldn't have edited the tags out in the first place. | |
| Jul 31, 2015 at 9:09 | comment | added | jacwah | I thought socket.io is essentially the same as websockets, but upon further inspection, I realise that I'm wrong. | |
| Jul 31, 2015 at 7:44 | comment | added | mjolka | On a similar note, I think that rxjs (Reactive Extensions for JavaScript) is a valid tag. We already have rx-java, system.reactive (Rx.NET), and reactive-cocoa, which are all part of the ReactiveX family. | |
| Jul 30, 2015 at 23:58 | history | answered | RubberDuck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |