Timeline for Flagging users who select "No Action Needed" in First Posts review queue
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2019 at 0:48 | vote | accept | Sᴀᴍ OnᴇᴌᴀMod | ||
| Dec 23, 2018 at 17:09 | comment | added | Graipher | @rolfl Thanks for the clarification. | |
| Dec 23, 2018 at 14:38 | comment | added | rolfl Mod | @Graipher - no, it does not mean the standard has changed. It just means that on the continuum of possible issues on the site, policing it is hard because there is no "lightweight" tool to do a "mild reprimand". Given that we cannot effectively remove the button, it's not like we can take action when someone uses it. We can only encounrage people to give other people the opportunity to do more than "nothing" in the review queue. | |
| Dec 23, 2018 at 11:31 | comment | added | Graipher | So, does that mean that the standard has changed? That '"No Action Needed" is never appropriate (unless you already commented/edited/voted on the post outside the queue)' is no longer true and was only a general policy to avoid people cheesing the system to get gold badges instead of ensuring that we don't miss the opportunity to interact with new users (even if it is only through an edit/upvote)? | |
| Dec 22, 2018 at 15:25 | comment | added | Simon Forsberg Mod | Ok monkey, I'll leave those flags for you. Just don't have high hopes for our flag average handling time ;) | |
| Dec 22, 2018 at 15:09 | history | answered | rolflMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |