Timeline for Is it fair to close a question with a bounty attached to it
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 8:53 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
Feb 12, 2014 at 20:49 | vote | accept | konijn | ||
Nov 25, 2013 at 9:54 | comment | added | Anirban Nag 'tintinmj' | There is also a post in MSO worth checking. | |
Nov 15, 2013 at 23:40 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon | I, uh, must have forgotten the part where you mention it's been done before - just re-read your answer... my phone's screen doesn't fit that part + all the comments + the touch qwerty keyboard :) ..I guess that could be one of such exceptional cases then. | |
Nov 15, 2013 at 23:14 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon | @Jamal Yup. If the OP won't fix their code, fixing it for them would create a precedent. I think the fix should appear in a comment, and if anyone wants to review it they ought to take it into consideration, but the OP's code is for the OP to fix IMHO. And after the bounty is awarded we can close/put on-hold if it's still not fixed. | |
Nov 15, 2013 at 23:08 | comment | added | Jamal | @retailcoder: You mean fixing the code with an edit? | |
Nov 15, 2013 at 23:07 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon | @Jamal that last statement looks like it's opening a door we'd rather not stick our feet into, no? | |
Nov 15, 2013 at 22:14 | comment | added | Jamal | @Malachi: Yes, that should be okay. If we're able to review code that works, regardless of how it was fixed, then I think that's even better. | |
Nov 15, 2013 at 22:08 | comment | added | Malachi | I understand that, but the point is, someone could "legally" make the code work before giving the answer making it all "legal" , Right? | |
Nov 15, 2013 at 21:44 | comment | added | Jamal | @Malachi: However, this isn't related to the bounty. As they have nothing to do with votes (not even the rep cap), the bounty can still be properly awarded even if the question is already CW. | |
Nov 15, 2013 at 21:39 | comment | added | Jamal | @Malachi: This will be triggered after the OP makes 5 more edits. Or, if 2 more users (I believe) make an edit. | |
Nov 15, 2013 at 21:38 | comment | added | Malachi | how many more edits until this becomes a community wiki question? | |
Nov 15, 2013 at 21:26 | history | answered | Jamal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |