3
\$\begingroup\$

I have a question about my Code Review Stack Exchange post: Driver for Sensor payload Decoder

I have been trying to get some suggestions on the code which I have written after learning about drivers. Tried in other forums came here only after their suggestion. Can agree at first I might not post it the way it follows the rules. But I have done changes of whatever I understood from mere 2 comments and rules to post a query. And still being put on hold without any comments wouldn't help me understand in anyway of what I'm supposed to do.

New contributor
Hemanth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ There's a yellow banner under your question, referring to (among other things) the help center. This does not answer your question? \$\endgroup\$ – Mast Aug 14 at 9:24
3
\$\begingroup\$

At the moment of writing this, your question is an improperly formatted code dump without explanation of the requirements or the problem you solved with it. We are not magicians, we can't read your mind, so we don't have enough to work with here. The question is not reviewable.

That's why it got closed.

Is it salvageable? Yes. But you'll have to put some work in.

The specific close reason for your question states we're lacking context. This means we need to see more about the code and how it's used. With a bit of an explanation of why you wrote this (what problem does it solve).

Note:

Clarification:

You state the following:

Put on-hold and off topic 2 time

Not on Code Review. According to the timeline it was closed once. Are you referring to your Stack Overflow question instead? Keep in mind Code Review and Stack Overflow are considered different sites, with different scopes, and your question got closed on both by different users.

Update:

The question got heavily edited and is now reopened.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ First time when I posted it was put off-topic. Second time, after reading the comments and I made the changes I rephrased the title. \$\endgroup\$ – Hemanth Aug 14 at 9:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .